阿克巴尔-拉马尼案件可能因SC指示而移交:法院

2020-10-14 12:06

Akbar-Ramani Case May Be Transferred Due to SC Directions: Court gaJ世界播

阿克巴尔-拉马尼案件可能因SC指示而移交:法院gaJ世界播


暂无gaJ世界播


Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Vishal Pahuja, on Tuesday, 13 October, informed that, only matters filed against MPs and MLAs can be listed before the Rouse Avenue Court, where the defamation case brought on by ex-MP MJ Akbar against journalist Priya Ramani was being heard so far. He cited Supreme Court directions as the reason for the same. gaJ世界播

10月13日星期二,另一名大都会治安法官Vishal Pahuja通知说,只有针对国会议员和MLA提起的案件才能列入劳斯大道法院,到目前为止,前国会议员MJ Akbar对记者Priya Ramani提起的诽谤案正在审理中。他援引最高法院的指示作为同样的原因。gaJ世界播


ACMM Pahuja further informed that the matter will now be listed before a District and Sessions Judge, on Thursday, for appropriate orders.If the case is transferred, it can be expected that the final arguments will have to be made all over again. gaJ世界播

ACMM Pahuja进一步告知,这件事现在将于周四提交地区和会议法官,等待适当的命令。如果案件被移交,可以预见,最后的论点将不得不重新进行。gaJ世界播


Incidentally, MJ Akbar’s lawyer Geeta Luthra was going to give her rebuttal, on Tuesday, to to defence counsel Rebecca John’s final arguments. gaJ世界播

顺便说一句,MJ Akbar的律师Geeta Luthra将在周二对她对辩护律师丽贝卡·约翰(Rebecca John)的最后论点进行反驳。gaJ世界播


Ramani’s lawyer Rebecca John quoted US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as she concluded her final arguments in the case, on 19 September. gaJ世界播

拉马尼的律师丽贝卡·约翰(Rebecca John)在9月19日结束了对此案的最后辩论时引用了美国最高法院法官鲁思·巴德·金斯伯格(Ruth Bader Ginsburg)的话。gaJ世界播


BACKGROUND gaJ世界播

背景。gaJ世界播


In her arguments, Rebecca John had said that Priya Ramani was being “targeted selectively” to halt the avalanche of allegations against Akbar; and addressed claims of Akbar’s “impeccable reputation.” gaJ世界播

丽贝卡·约翰(Rebecca John)在她的辩论中曾表示,普里亚·拉马尼(Priya Ramani)是“有选择的目标”,以阻止针对阿克巴的雪崩指控;并回应了有关阿克巴“无可挑剔的声誉”的说法。gaJ世界播


“I would like to highlight at this point that the (Vogue) article deals with both Akbar and other male bosses,” Rebecca John had said, beginning her final arguments before a Delhi Court on 5 September. gaJ世界播

丽贝卡·约翰(Rebecca John)9月5日在德里一家法院开始了她的最后一次辩论,她说:“在这一点上,我想强调的是,(Vogue)这篇文章涉及阿克巴和其他男性老板。”gaJ世界播


She also pointed out that Ramani had pleaded “truth” as her defence, “made in good faith, in public interest, and for public good”, and went on to cite exceptions 1 and 9 interlinked with exception 3 to Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code. gaJ世界播

她还指出,Ramani以“真相”为辩护理由,“出于善意、为了公众利益和公共利益”,并接着列举了与“印度刑法”第499条例外3相互关联的例外1和例外9。gaJ世界播


In a 2017 article about sexual predators in workplace, written for Vogue, Ramani had described her own ordeal of having been sexually harassed by a former boss. A year later, in the wake of the #MeToo Movement, Ramani had alleged on social media that the former boss had, in fact, been Akbar. gaJ世界播

在2017年为Vogue撰写的一篇关于职场性掠夺者的文章中,拉马尼描述了自己被前老板性骚扰的痛苦经历。一年后,在#MeToo运动之后,拉马尼在社交媒体上声称,前老板实际上是阿克巴。gaJ世界播


Akbar had subsequently filed a criminal defamation case against Ramani, asserting that Ramani’s allegations were false and that it had cost him his “stellar reputation”. gaJ世界播

阿克巴尔随后对拉马尼提起了刑事诽谤诉讼,声称拉马尼的指控是虚假的,这让他失去了“卓越的声誉”。gaJ世界播

© 2016 世界播 www.shijiebobao.com 中国互联网举报中心 京ICP证140141号 鄂ICP备18018000号-1
违法和不良信息举报: