If Trump were to pardon the Capitol rioters, Guiliani, Bannon, his kids, himself, etc. what are the chances that the pardons could be invalidated by the Supreme Court if they could be shown to be a part of a seditious conspiracy?
如果特朗普赦免国会暴徒Guiliani、Bannon、他的孩子、他自己等,如果这些赦免被证明是煽动阴谋的一部分,那么最高法院宣布赦免无效的可能性有多大?
Answered by: Mike Jones,Over 30 years in the technology industry.
回答者:迈克·琼斯(Mike Jones),他在科技行业工作了30多年
Zero.
零。
The President could go on Fox and announce that he’s selling a pardon to Bannon for one meeeeelion dollars and the Supreme Court couldn’t invalidate it. Trump could be impeached and prosecuted for bribery after impeachment, but the pardon would stand.
总统可以在福克斯电视台上宣布,他将以一百万美元的价格向班农出售赦免令,而最高法院不能宣布其无效。特朗普可能会在弹劾后被弹劾并以行贿罪被起诉,但赦免将继续有效。
There’s simply nothing in the Constitution that gives the Court the authority to invalidate a pardon. The pardon power is solely given to the President and the only restriction on it is that they can’t pardon in cases of impeachment. And to be clear, that means they can’t pardon the impeachment itself, not that a President can’t issue pardons if they’re impeached or that they can’t pardon Federal crimes underlying an impeachment.
宪法中根本没有赋予最高法院宣布赦免无效的权力。赦免权只授予总统,唯一的限制是他们不能在弹劾案中赦免。需要明确的是,这意味着他们不能赦免弹劾本身,并不是总统不能赦免他们被弹劾,或者他们不能赦免弹劾背后的联邦罪行。